Posted by: colorblindcupid | February 5, 2008

What is the Definition of an Interracial Relationship?

I was trying to find information on the history of interracial relationships – basically how they were looked upon throughout history, especially during times where different races didn’t have as much contact with each other. During this search, I came across this article on About.com (I love that site). I also read the link to the article regarding whether or not interracial marriage is prohibited in the Bible – the beginning of that article was of particular interest in discussing Darwin and the history of the term “race” and how scientifically speaking, it’s sort of a useless and irrelevant term. (The latter half is a debate that doesn’t refer to interracial relationships.)

Trying to put all that in context got me thinking about how I, and people in general define an interracial relationship. Someone commented on the recent “what does it mean to be colorblind” thread that they didn’t realize they were in an interracial relationship when they started dating an Indian man. I remember when I first started dating Saresh, the thought did not occur to me that I was in an interracial relationship either. I don’t think that came into play until I noticed Saresh sometimes uncomfortable with some people staring (which I was oblivious to until he pointed it out), but moreso after the issue of his parents not accepting our relationship primarily because of my race.

Why didn’t I think we were interracial? In fact, if you asked many of our friends, I don’t think they would say they ever thought of us as interracial, some of them having even made that statement: “I wouldn’t have classified you as interracial. You’re just Saresh and CBC.” I don’t know if that’s because we’re friends and they have a relationship with us, or if that’s because they really wouldn’t have classified it as an interracial relationship – probably a little of both. I do notice it with strangers though – the majority who seem not to notice anything different at all, and the others who just keep staring as if their mind can’t compute what they’re seeing (and the very rare stare of animosity).

My mother doesn’t think I’m in an interracial relationship. If you try to bring it up, she’ll just argue with you like you’ve lost your wits. I always remember her old logic to the argument that Saresh “looks Greek,” doesn’t seem Indian at all, and therefore we’re not interracial. In some ways, I’m not so sure she’s wrong. Which also got me thinking this time, if a white person married someone from Greece or say, Armenia – would that be classified as interracial? Intercultural definitely, but interracial? Are Greeks and Armenians considered to be white? I think my mom would say yes (a lot of people would) – I would have up until considering this question now, and now I have no idea, but if I had to give an answer I’d say yes. I think they would be classified as white under the Census, but I didn’t check, so not sure. Do Greeks and Armenians consider themselves white, and does that personal definition change depending on where they live – i.e. does a Greek American think of themselves as white versus a Greek living in Greece?

I had a teacher in High School that was Armenian. She belly danced for money on the side, and the boys were all fascinated with her. I don’t think anyone ever considered her anything other than white – I don’t think they ever considered race in regards to her at all (we were a predominantly white small town). Though she was born in Armenia, she had an American accent and taught all the social science, including American History.

And where and how does skin color play into the interracial equation? I would bet that most people would consider an American white person married to a Middle Eastern person an interracial relationship, even though an Armenian or even a Spaniard may have a darker skin color. In fact, being South Indian, Saresh is darker than many black people, and I think that the same people who don’t consider us interracial would consider my relationship interracial if Saresh was a light skinned black person. Is a Spaniard/American white relationship interracial? I think people consider Hispanic/white to be interracial, but I wonder if the same consideration is given to people of Spanish descent.

We used to hang out with this interracial couple (her – Filipino/Chinese; him – white). To my knowledge, they never faced any discrimination regarding their relationship, and both sets of parents never had any issues either. We always found it funny when the husband would talk about someone he knew that was black – we knew they were black because he felt compelled to mention it as if it mattered to the story, and he did it so weird. He would drop his voice down on the word “black” to a whisper, and then finish with the Seinfeld, “not that there’s anything wrong with that.” Clearly there was something wrong with it to him or he wouldn’t have felt compelled to qualify it every single time. So why would someone who was married to a “brown” person have issues with black people?

As the About.com article suggests at the end, I think we (Americans at least, but probably everyone) have a ranking system of acceptability, with white/black mixes being the least socially accepted and Asian/white being the most socially accepted. I think the old miscegenation laws that varied from state to state would attest to that, allowing for different races to marry in one state, which were prohibited in others (i.e. blacks and Asians could marry in one state, but not in another; whites and Asians okay in one but not in another). In that Colorblind comments thread, someone commented that a friend said they wouldn’t date a black, but when asked about Indians who are also “brown,” they didn’t have a problem because their parents never said anything about Indians. I don’t think that’s an uncommon view – I certainly never heard my parents ranting about Indians or Koreans or Japanese or Chinese.

I always thought race was color based, but I don’t believe it is. It’s clearly not genetics based. So much of our social views of a whole class of people make up an undercurrent that I believe is stronger than skin color. The skin color is just an easy tag – a way to not have to think that we may be discriminating against someone because of their culture, or to not have to admit that we’re making judgments about an entire culture that we really don’t know much about. I think I have more questions in this post than can reasonably be answered.


Responses

  1. Nice analysis! You’re making me think more.

  2. The whole post was good food for thought.

    I have to comment on the ‘Inter-racial marriage: is it biblical? …. ‘ article.

    Inter-racial marriage: is it biblical? ….

    It is sad that so many Christians would say it isn’t ok.
    People from Biblical times married other races…they also married into their own families.

    From Old Testament to New Testament to the Present day here have been lots and lots of changes. I look to the bible more for a reference that a definitive… but that is just me.

  3. I think a lot of people use the Bible to justify their own position – they’ll bend scripture to fit whatever agenda they want. Others just follow them.

  4. Some social theorists, CA stop gagging, argue race doesn’t even exist. There is a wonderfully, elaborate argument here I could fine tune and make here but I’ve been too busy over at my new blog. Ohhh aren’t you guys devastated to lose some of my superfluous musings…

    I wanted to wait to show people my blog until I was further along in the entries, but I thought I’d give you a sneak peak. For some reason I thought some of the gals on here would really like this entry:

    http://neokalypso.wordpress.com/2008/02/01/my-first-kissand-stuff/

    Sorry to self promote CBC–but you might enjoy it too ;) !!!! Please leave comments if you like!

  5. CBC, as to the census records, I do a LOT of genealogy research. According to the 1930 census records, anyone from the Balkan states is considered “white”, along with any Native American not accepting their land rights. But anyone of Asian descent was listed as Chinese due to the influx of Chinese workers on the West Coast. Most of the old laws in different states prohibited marriage with only the African-Americans and Native Americans (that were still classified as Indians). Most of them didn’t actually have laws in place to prohibit marriage to any other race including the Chinese…at least, as far, as I have found out through my genealogical researches. There were many back in the late 1800’s/early 1900’s that would force you to leave their state if you married inter-racially to Native American or African-Americans. We have an old copy of a marriage bond license for my 3rd/4th great grandfather(I forget how many greats at that point). He paid $1500 to marry my half Cherokee/half something else (we think African-American or Spanish mix by the picture of her that we have) back in the 1830’s. During that time period, Tennessee forced you to leave their state if you married outside your race..in which they did leave, and went to Mississippi.

    Btw, I like the new pic and name there Inbetween aka NK. CBC, I really liked that article that you had linked to the blog. It was very enlightening and interesting. I really enjoyed how they re-defined for me the word inter-racial. Although, I don’t necessarily agree that the Bible means you can only marry Christians…it is only a suggestion by God from what I have read in it so far, but if the Bible teaches us to be tolerant and loving to “thy neighbor” that’s not a good excuse for not marrying interculturaly either. Besides, I have so far quite a few similarities between Christianity and Hinduism belief-wise. Even my CS believes in Jesus as a prophet. And yes, CS and I are still together, but I commented on that in another section.

    As far as I know, in Texas, most people tend to ignore inter-cultural/inter-racial relationships other than white/black. I still do see and hear a lot of comments from the older generations in passing when there is a black/white couple nearby. And you’re right CBC, my CS is also darker than many black people, but people don’t tend to look at him as a black person, but as an Indian, although he said in his culture, he’s considered black because of where he is from? (I’m not expert on this CBC, you may know more about their culture here). I told him that here, in America, if he tried to identify himself as black, there are people who would get very angry and upset because black seems to have become a certain set ground or identifier of American people that are of African descendency. I had to explain our American history to him at that point. Also, on many applications here now, instead of Caucasian, the box now says “white, non-Hispanic.” I don’t know if this means that Hispanic people are now being considered a form of white or what? Anyway, that’s my long comment of the day :)

  6. Oh yeah, that whole “white-non-Hispanic” category is stupid. People from Spain are white, so their descendants in Cuba, Argentina, Uruguay, Chile, etc. end up “white” on the skin level, but our government still wants to classify them as “Hispanic.” Actually there is no such thing as a “Hispanic” race. It’s a language that ties them together, not a color. Stupid, just plain stupid.

  7. NK – shameless plugs are allowed. I’ll check it out. :)

    Ara – that Loving Day web site had some info on what states considered what as far as allowing marriages. Like in a couple states, Asians were classified as whites, so they were allowed to marry whites. In others, they were classified as “Oriental” and non-white, and were permitted to marry blacks, but not whites. It was weird (I guess just depended on the racial views of the lawmakers in those states!).

    Yeah – I’ve never understood the white-non-Hispanic thing either. Especially when you consider the “Hispanic” population of Latin and South America is descended from Spaniards, as FW says. And then what would you consider South American natives? So many of them mix with the “pure” (if there is such a thing) Spanish population, and if they move to the U.S., mixed or not, I think they’d be considered Hispanic because we don’t even get the difference really.

    That’s what I’m saying – when you really think about it and get right down to it, you can’t even define race – we’re using sometimes completely arbitrary definitions to pigeon-hole people into a race. And as NK says, technically genetically speaking, race doesn’t actually exist. I think it just exists for us in a social context.

  8. Yeah sometimes I have major existential crisis’ when thinking about social constructs (like race)…

    Am I a social construct!?!?!? AAAAAAAaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!

  9. Well, earlier today, I worked with my co-worker that got married back in December that had had so many problems with her in-laws. I told her about this site and invited her to it. I just felt that the advice and friendship I have received here would benefit her as well since she herself is in an inter-cultural marriage. :)


Categories