Saresh and I went out to dinner on Saturday for his birthday (yay for uninterrupted conversation!), and I was bringing up some of the articles I had read in that Little India magazine. He was kind of like “eh” on that conversation and I quipped that I was more interested in Indian culture than he was. In all seriousness, he said, “You are. I’m Indian. I already know that stuff. Lived it – not that interested.”
That got me thinking about how when we first started dating, I kept forgetting he was Indian at all. In the absence of his parents, short of his looks, he never really did anything or talked much about Indian culture. I think part of why our early marriage years were such a culture shock to me was that despite dating a 1st generation immigrant, I might as well have been dating the Midwestern white boy down the hall. I had no exposure to what I’d consider traditional Indian culture prior to getting married, so it was sort of an “all of sudden” adjustment period.
Saresh has always been all about America from the description he gives. I think he must have given his parents a perpetual headache, wondering if they never should have left India. Pictures of him at Indian pujas and parties as he was growing up are hysterical – he looks so angry and annoyed to be there. He wanted to be out playing baseball with his buddies or just going out and having random teenage fun.
There is another type of Indian child that straddles both cultures. I observe some people who it seems can’t decide if they are actually interested in their Indian heritage or not. I don’t know what’s inside their head, but if it was me I envision a mental conversation like, “Should I be interested? Is it bad if I’m not? Shouldn’t I want to be interested? How will this affect my friends? Will my parents be disappointed? Am I too Indian? Not Indian enough?” I would want to want to be interested, but be so unsure having grown up outside of India… I think, anyway.
I wondered if this difference didn’t come from the fact that Saresh lived in India until he was 9, so in effect, he “lived it” as he likes to say; versus a 2nd generation child who is growing up in American culture and only exposed to their parents and the immediate American Indian community – because their culture wouldn’t just be Indian anymore, as Saresh’s was for so long – it would American and Indian. How would you know where one ends and the other begins, and can you be in both?
When I was reading Bad Indian Girl’s “Are you a bad mother?,” I was struck by #10 on the list, “You buy real Halloween costumes for your child and do not force her to be ‘Indian Girl’ in a sari.” I thought it was funny because one Halloween I considered dressing DD up in one of her many saris because she never had occasion to wear them otherwise, and they were so fancy and unique to me – I thought it would be cool. I was going to make her “Indian Girl” for Halloween, but then she wanted to be a fairy, so I didn’t. Here I was the white mom of a half-Indian child, and I thought it was a neat idea, and clearly there are a bunch of Indian moms out there horrified at making their child suffer something that pained them to go through as a child. As a white born and bred American girl, I have a different view of the culture looking in from the outside. It is unfamiliar and intriguing to me, so what one inside the culture finds oppressive, I may have a fascination with.
This all came together for me in thinking about one of the fears of Indian parents regarding their child marrying a white/non-Indian – that their Indian culture would be diminished or taken away somehow. I think they’re worried about something that wasn’t there in the first place.
Saresh had already fallen away from Hinduism long before I met him. He was attending a Jesuit University and all his friends were Christian, and he studied philosophy and theology there – his Hinduism no longer fitting into to his spiritual life, crowded out by a growing spiritual knowledge of other religions and ways of thinking. His conversion to Christianity had little to do with me at all – I never even asked, and routinely joke that he’s a better Christian than I am (and that’s actually no joke).
You couldn’t pay the man to wear Indian clothing – he owns none, and I’m scared to learn the fate of the one gold silk puffy shirt his mom made him wear for his 18th birthday (I think it might have been burnt or something!). He was upset at our pre-wedding festivities, when at a puja, his uncle applied and then smeared down in a streak a botu (not sure if that’s what it’s called on a man) on his forehead. He had on a really nice suit and he looked like a disgruntled American businessman stuck at an uncomfortable cultural religious event. All the pictures from that puja closely resemble his childhood “I can’t believe I have to endure this” face.
He seems entirely unconcerned that I don’t know how to cook anything Indian (white rice, anyone?) – happy to eat the diet of American and German cuisine that I do know how to cook – though not so much German! He can’t stand Hindi music or movies. His parents quit watching Hindi movies in front of him because he made fun of them so much. Instead, our home is filled with an obscene number of Metallica albums (Lord, help me) and manly shoot ‘em up movies like The Rock.
In my case, if anything I’ve probably added to Saresh’s Indian culture. When an Auntie calls to invite us to a party, if I answer I’m more likely to say yes than he is. I don’t mind going to the temple on occasion because it’s fascinating to me. I read (used to! grr…) TANA – he never has, then I just give him the Cliff Notes version. I’ll read about Hinduism and ask him questions, which he’ll discuss with me, but usually end with him saying, “And yet again you can see why I’m not Hindu.” He wants to help me understand his culture because I want to and if I ask for help, he always gives it – though if I never asked at all, I wonder if he’d be fine with that, too.
The only time we ever hit an argument over me not wanting to do something regarding his culture was when we were seriously discussing traveling to India and I didn’t want to go. He was hurt that I didn’t want to see where he was born and spent his first 9 years. Which isn’t technically true – I didn’t want to go for other reasons and seeing where he was born isn’t a strong enough motivator yet for me. I wonder if he’d been more “Indian” all this time, if I’d have a stronger desire to see it. Honestly, I’m not entirely sure he’s all hip to go either. I think he’d like to see some family and also get his parents off his back about going, but my seeing where he grew up may not be a strong enough motivator for him either because we’ve shelved this conversation for now and have no immediate plans to go – and he knows if he asked me to go because it was important to him, I’d do it. He hasn’t asked.
At any rate, I don’t think you could use this argument in winning the parents over – “Hey, mom and dad; marrying this white girl will make me MORE Indian!” But I thought it was interesting and yet another backwards logic applied to the reasons given for not marrying a non-Indian. And mostly it’s just random ponderings that filled my head over the weekend.

rotflol!
Ok, Ang lived in China until he was 11, so I had an IDENTICAL experience – Ang was so American when we were dating, that it never hit me in the face that his culture might be so different from mine….because it wasn’t.
He spent his teenage years listening to rap music (aaahhhh!) When we’d been married two years I sold all of his gangsta rap CDs in a garage sale for $.50 each – a group of black men came by and bought the whole box, and Ang was devastated.
Ang worked at Eddie Bauer in college and had lots of preppy clothes. And of course he loves any American military-related movies.
So for a while I felt like I was dating a white guy in some respects. It was only after you get deeper into the relationship that his initial cultural upbringing comes into play. (Like with the whole “we hide all disease and death from other family members” stuff)
I used to try to make him teach me Chinese, but he would laugh at my pronunciation and he just wasn’t interested in me learning that language. After a while he even told me he doesn’t want to speak it, because his language ability has stalled at a elementary school level, and it’s too much work to remember things. He says he’s been dreaming in English so long that Chinese is no longer his “native” language.
So I really relate to your husband’s behavior since it was so similar to Ang’s. Oftentimes I’m more interested in Chinese culture than he is. As for going to China – HE’S the one who finally said NO this year! I was shocked!
Turns out he’s been studying the cultural revolution and the communist history in China, because of what his parents suffered. He wanted to understand his parents better – and once he learned enough details, he told me he will never set foot in China again until it is FREE.
I was like OMG! I’ll never get to go to China then, because who knows if the commies will ever be overthrown there! ACK. I think I missed my chance to see it, because now Ang has a very angry hatred for the government there, and feels it is a horrible place.

Maybe he will soften in time. Or maybe not. I was like “wth? your mom goes back all the time!”
He said “I don’t care. I won’t go back. There are other Asians who won’t return to their home countries for the same reason, and I’m not going to either”
SIGH.
ok enough rambling. This site is addictive.
By: chineseambassador on December 11, 2007
at 4:02 am
Yeah, my one Indian guy friend is a self-proclaimed Coconut. He says he’s white on the inside and dark on the outside
. He pretty much stands up to his mom on everything and laughs off that he is the “bad son” (i.e. he doesn’t call home every day). As far as people growing up in India vs. the U.S. … those can be complicated narratives. My pal Gunvir lived in India the first 17 years and basically rejected it because he says there were so many more opportunities here. My guy has made about 13 trips back to India in his life and I know he is definitely not a “coconut.” For me, I think it’s kind of cool he remains down with his culture, and is very open about it, in many ways. I asked him the questions CBC posed about sort of straddling two worlds last night. He said it felt less like he is inbetween worlds, but recognized that Indian and American culture both impact him. He says he tries to make desicions based on what makes sense to him given both influences. Speaking of all these different narratives, there is SUCH a wealth of diversity within Indian culture (not to mention among individuals!!!). I know people from about 12 different Indian states and many of the customs, traditions and religious beliefs vary to great extents. A lot of my “Northie” friends tell me Telugu is a special breed
and can be among the most conservative in the country. My guy was like “What? Really?” He doesn’t know any different! Experiencing India itself is kind of searing, mind-blowing, in your face diversity too. So much so it could knock the restlessness or cerebral musings out of anyone
(it did for me!).
By: Inbetween on December 11, 2007
at 2:03 pm
Oh and CA, Balzac and the Chinese Seamstress is a beautiful little book centered around the cultural revolution. Also, there is a chapter in Arthur Kleinman’s, What Really Matters: Living a Moral Life amidst Uncertainty and Danger, that gives a heartbreaking and illuminating narrative about one man’s experience living through the cultural revolution. I’m guess your hubs knows about the former, but the second piece I mentioned is truly incredible!
By: Inbetween on December 11, 2007
at 2:08 pm
So can you imagine how confused the two sibs that were in my daughters’ classes are?
They are half Chinese and half Indian. They spoke/speak? Chinese at home and do Indian dance.
But they are mostly Polo and Lexus.
By: Mom on the Run on December 11, 2007
at 4:39 pm
hee hee
My DSL keeps going out, so if I’m not around, I’m pouting without internet. I swear if the wind blows the wrong way around here the DSL goes out. This was a whole bunch of stuff I wanted to say earlier, but kept getting kicked off the internet – grrr…
LOL – gansta rap CDs! Saresh would KILL me if I got rid of his heavy metal. I had to make my own playlist on his ipod because when he just hits shuffle in the car, every other song is Metallica or Korn or Gravity Kills or White Zombie. He told me I didn’t appreciate the art form because I wouldn’t listen to it – I told him I grew up in small-town Midwest in the 80s – I was FORCED to listen to it by every mulleted, Metallica wallet carrying boyfriend I ever had in High School. I decided I didn’t like it way before we met!
Coconut – Ha! I have to remember that. Yeah – about the straddling two cultures. I never asked anybody, so those were more my musings on what I thought it would be like. Some of the kids who were just early teens when I got married are now all going off to grad school, and they have different conversations with me than I see them having with the aunties and uncles. They say stuff to me and I have to focus on maintaining a passive face, because I think their parents have no idea all the stuff that’s going through their heads. I must seem “safe” to say it to because they know I’m not going to run and tell the rest of the community.
Northies and Southies have a “thing” – I imagine some South Indians would have some stereotypes they’d like to throw out about the North. I don’t quite get it, but hey – we had a Civil War, so who am I to judge?
By: colorblindcupid on December 11, 2007
at 5:56 pm
Haha, yeah I think some Southies are subject to “county bumpkin” flack from some Northies. Historically, the South was never colonized by the British, so some Southies like to say they are a “purer” Indian culture. Who knows…you say potato, I say rice…
It’s so cool that you are a “safe” person your relatives can confide in. Yet, another reason they are lucky to have you as family. Even though it seems you aren’t in a position to say much, there is definitely something to be said for your non-judgemental, listening presence. It’s definitely something you have to uniquely offer.
By: Inbetween on December 11, 2007
at 6:12 pm
Ok, first I have to say how happy I am that I stumbled upon this site! Thank you for it!!!!!
Second, after reading through all this, I wanted to ask the writer about this post and her experience. If all this is true, I can see why the other things I’ve read, particularly about the wedding and the in-laws, was such a shock. If he does not care that much for the culture and isn’t Hindu at all, why does he let his parents impose all of those things on you and him (esp. given how miserable they made you at times)?
I don’t mean for this to sound judgmental toward him at all and I know you said that you’re interested in some of it. I’m just asking b/c it relates to my own situation and I want to understand what he chose/why he decided to put up with all of that.
I’ve been seriously dating an Indian guy for a few years, and he fits everything you wrote above. There is really no trace of Indianness beyond his exterior. We have a great life together and I’m very happy with it. But I’ve been having a hard time moving forward because I’m scared that, no matter what he says he wants (i.e., a life like we have now) or how great things are now, I know that I’m not open to living with two cultures in my life. I grew up in the south in a conservative, Christian home, and that is the culture in which I intend to raise my kids. I’m sure some people will judge me for this, but obviously combining cultures in a marriage is not for everyone, so forgive me if you find this distasteful and just try to understand that we have to choose what is best for ourselves. Every time he talks about marriage, I think about what if once we get married, he reunites with his parents (who he’s almost estranged from now, due to his lack of conformity with their culture and expectations) or what if he lets them try to impose on us in the way that most of those parents do? I just wonder how that ends up happening when the guy himself is clearly uninterested in it. I want my bf to have what he wants, but I guess that deep down I wonder how he can stand to be so estranged from his family and if he’s really this “white” at the core. In my naivete, I originally did believe it was only skin deep, but now I know that it is an entirely different culture, and I just don’t know how much he’s really thought through what he tells me about wanting the same things I do. Would you trust him? Did Saresh tell you things would change when you married? I tell him all the time what I expect, but for some reason, I’m still scared about this.
By: Belle on December 11, 2007
at 7:40 pm
Ooh!! I can’t wait to hear CBC’s response for you
. I will say I’m not surprised your upbringing was conservative and instilled with Christian values–it’s likely so was his (maybe within a different RELIGIOUS context though). I don’t think it’s an accident that some of us keen, small town girls are attracted to nice, intelligent Indian boys who come from solid upbringings. Think about that…
By: Inbetween on December 11, 2007
at 7:55 pm
Okay my experience will be closer to yours, Belle.
Even though I married a Chinese guy rather than Indian, there are some similarities because your question has more to do with religion than culture.
While religion is a PART of culture, it is NOT the same thing.
I am the same as you – raised in a conservative evangelical home, and that’s what I wanted for my kids as well. I hear you on the judgment – but we only feel that way because our society as a whole is rather fond of demonizing evangelicals and at the same time embracing other religions and cultures that *could* be seen as more barbaric. (I’m thinking of the Muslim women in this world who are forced to wear the hajib on pain of death. Just this morning on the news another 16-year old girl was strangled to death by her father for not wanting to wear the hajib.)
So please don’t apologize for being a Christian. I am a Christian and I write on this blog, and you are welcome here.
Here’s the deal. Religious views are more important than cultural differences. If your world viewpoints and faith are the same, culture doesn’t matter.
Christians come from every walk of life and every color of skin, and every culture. That’s why my experience with Ang was easy in the beginning – our faith was the same, and that automatically made everything else small potatoes.
You need to first evaluate your own faith and the faith of your boyfriend, to see if you are truly in harmony in that area. Once you evaluate that, THEN it is easier to guess how much of a problem his family is going to be in your relationship.
The first conversation you have is with yourself. The second conversation you have is with your boyfriend. You need to discuss this with him, so he knows your feelings and understands what your expectations are.
You don’t have to love everything about his culture. That’s not what it takes to have a successful intercultural marriage. But you DO have to have honest and hard conversations about these things BEFORE you get married.
sorry so long – welcome! CBC probably can add more……..
By: chineseambassador on December 11, 2007
at 8:40 pm
Yes, a good point! But don’t you think that there is way more dogma and conformity in all those rituals and the Indian “tradition” than we grew up with? Maybe I’m just not ok with it b/c I’m in a sense like them – not open to traditions other than my own – but then again, I always felt my parents supported me in choosing my own life and I definitely can’t live with people horning in on my wedding, how I raise my kids, what I wear, what I eat, etc. I’m definitely not open to any change on those fronts (and I wouldn’t try to make other people change either). So sometimes I think I’m an idiot for even still dating this guy (I mean, how can a person not from our upbringing really be sure they want it? It will obviously just entrench his estrangement, and I’d feel awful if he did that just for me).
By: Belle on December 11, 2007
at 8:41 pm
Hi Belle – welcome!
I guess a big difference for me was that Saresh was not estranged from his parents. They were always very close, even though he was very independent by Indian family standards (i.e. did his own thing). I think because he loves and respects them so much, that made a difference in what he (and therefore me) was willing to put up with. I guess a “pick your battles” sort of mentality.
I’m not sure he knew what the future was going to be like when we got married, so he didn’t make promises one way or the other. I know he was fully prepared to be “exiled” by his parents for marrying me if it came to that, but that he wanted to resume the close relationship he was used to if possible. When the finally accepted that we were going to marry, they started to make steps in growing closer again. Also, being a man, I don’t think he really had a clue about the wedding stuff (no offense to all you men totally into weddings out there).
Since getting married, I think we’ve both been finding our way – the best way for us as a couple, to deal with the culture clash. I don’t actually think he knew what would happen. Back when we got married, Indian’s marrying non-Indians wasn’t as common as now (even though it was only 8 yrs ago), so he didn’t really have a map to go by of what would happen after the fact.
Many of the things that bother the ever-lovin’ crap out of me bother him – some of them even more. We still care about his parents though, and they love us and they adore their granddaughter, so Saresh and I each work with each other to find what’s acceptable to us and what isn’t, while maintaining a close relationship with his parents. We respect them, but we don’t always do what they want.
For your situation, I can’t say whether to trust him or not because I don’t know him or his character. I think there’s a lot of things you need to hammer out with him before you go down the marriage road. Is he willing to convert to Christianity if that’s important to you? If not, but he’s okay with raising the kids Christian, is that enough for you? Even though he’s estranged from his parents, is he still involved in the Indian community at all? Does he want to reconcile with his parents? Does he want to be involved with the Indian community? I guess I’d be curious about what’s important to him, and then discussing what issues you have that you just aren’t willing to compromise on – like religion.
But I can’t tell you if you should trust his answers. I never doubted what my husband told me, and I’ve never found that he’s lied to me in all this time. I never got a “should I trust him” feeling – maybe that was naive of me back then, but I’ve learned through time that it was right to trust him. If you have a doubting feeling, maybe that’s something you should examine further with him – what’s making you feel that way? Is it the way he answers? A way he acts? Things he *doesn’t* say?
I hope that helps a little bit!
By: colorblindcupid on December 11, 2007
at 8:50 pm
Oh – also, this blog is a good chunk of venting, so don’t take it as “this is ALL my life ALL the time” – if it was, I might be stark raving mad instead of just needing a blog for therapy.
Don’t mean to scare you with all that!
By: colorblindcupid on December 11, 2007
at 8:53 pm
Yes it appears from what people are saying about their Indian families that they are much stricter than we are.
We had a structured upbringing and were taught right from wrong – but our parents likely did not force us to eat, dress, or work a certain way. I think in this way we are Americanized, being very individualistic. We are encouraged to pursue our own dreams, our own career choices, etc.
It seems like traditional Indian parents don’t like this or accept it. (Note the apparent *2* career choices, engineer or doctor lol)
This is a problem, but only if your boyfriend isn’t willing to stand up for you and your relationship. Like I said, you’ve got to have these hard discussions first. Find out if he truly is okay with your way of life, and find out if he’s willing to put you and your future kids ahead of his parents.
That’s the million-dollar question. Until you express these fears to your bf, you’re just driving yourself nuts!
By: chineseambassador on December 11, 2007
at 8:53 pm
CA’s response regarding religion was perfect.
The only other thing I’d add is that you don’t have to change who you are. If it’s something that makes you very uncomfortable – goes against the core of who you are, you shouldn’t change that.
But you have to judge the difference between that, and just not liking something because you don’t like it. It’s importance in you life is negligible. For instance, if your wedding is super important to you to do they way you want, I think that’s a biggie that you may not want to compromise on – because it might cause you to be resentful later. But, if it makes his mama (or your husband) happy to have you wear a sari once a year to some special party his parents are throwing – how important is that to you, really?
I don’t wear them anymore, but I used to – I had to figure out if I was even comfortable doing that, and what was worse – disappointing his mom, or not being true to myself. Admitting eventually that I wasn’t comfortable in them and wearing my own clothing to weddings and parties took precedence over her feelings – but I’m respectful about turning her down when she asks. She doesn’t ask much anymore – just sort of offers in case I want to. And it’s okay.
And MIL and FIL and Saresh all know that telling me what to do on any front is NEVER going to happen. But they can ask – if it’s important and I know why and it’s not something that goes against who I am, then I’m usually okay with it. To a point. Some things I don’t know yet, so I try and see – like the Annaprasanna – tried it, and I’m never doing it again. I don’t care if I have 5 kids and MIL thinks that they future’s will be doomed because of it.
By: colorblindcupid on December 11, 2007
at 9:02 pm
lol
Yes it’s perfectly ok to not want to shave your baby’s head or do the anaprasanna circus.
There is one thing from Chinese culture that I wish I knew how to do – Chinese parents train their babies to use the toilet almost from birth. I still haven’t figured out how they do it, but they don’t use diapers like we do.
So one advantage we all have, we can “cherry pick” the stuff from cultures that we like, and leave the stuff that freaks us out.
By: chineseambassador on December 11, 2007
at 9:33 pm
Thanks SO much to both of you for those thoughts. They’re so helpful and smart. I really can’t tell you how much I appreciated them.
And, CBC, I didn’t mean to make you feel like I thought your hardest moments were your every day. Sorry if I did sound like that. I think it just occurred to me while reading that I was probably as protective of my own “southern” culture as Indians are of theirs, and then I did feel a bit guilty b/c I’m the one expecting the compromises, which could mean that I put my bf in some of the positions I read about you being in, which are of course hard (and you’re the braver one for going through it; ultimately you are the one making it work, in a sense). So I hope you didn’t take it as a disagreement with what you’ve done as much as an empathy for how hard it is for the person adjusting to some presence of the other culture and seeing a scary part of myself as being the cause of that!
He doesn’t seem to wish to be a part of the Indian community, but I do think he’s a “go with the flow” type of guy, so I wonder what he will do if he’s pulled one way by me and one way by his family. I do think when he was younger he did some of that stuff to make them happy, so I guess it’s just knowing that I’m not willing to do that that scares me. Honestly, thinking it all through and reading your comments makes me wonder how it could work. I just feel like I’m asking him for too much and I myself am too inflexible, but I think I’d lose huge parts of myself trying to be ok with things I’m really not ok with if I ever tried to accomodate his family. I’ve known the type of family life I wanted my whole life, and church and a big Cinderella wedding is definitely part of it. I guess I just don’t feel confident that his family would be sufficiently tolerant of my living totally differently from them, and it would definitely be totally different.
Anyway. Thanks for sharing these hugely meaningful stories and private struggles. I am sure it makes you guys feel a bit vulnerable, but I really appreciate it. Talk to y’all soon!
By: Belle on December 11, 2007
at 9:42 pm
I truly admire all of you for even trying such a huge life altering relationship.
I’m still pissed that I have to eat off paper plates at every holiday and get between my kids and grandma before she goes off on “dressing like a godly woman” (insinuating that they dress like sluts….which they don’t….ironically, holy SIL does, so go figure).
I’m not worthy.
By: Mom on the Run on December 12, 2007
at 2:33 pm
Hey–I can’t believe that no one has brought up the movie The Namesake. Has anyone seen it? It might be fun if the blogmistresses did a review on it…
By: Inbetween on December 12, 2007
at 3:08 pm
MOTR – lol
and I haven’t seen the Namesake – I remember it being mentioned here before, though, so maybe CBC has seen it. Having a brain fart right now… need coffee
By: chineseambassador on December 12, 2007
at 3:17 pm
Jhumpa Lahiri’s “The Namesake” is my favorite book (I’ve read it cover-to-cover maybe 10 times). The movie’s excellent too, but, to me, it tells a different story than the book. I think a lot of people here could relate to both the book and the movie. They definitely touch on the theme of straddling cultures. There’s an extremely interesting “meeting the parents” scene too.
Btw, Inbetween, you are right – “Balzac and the Chinese Seamstress” is a beautiful book too- I devoured it in one sitting!
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 12, 2007
at 5:10 pm
I haven’t read it or seen it. I’d have a better shot at reading it because that can be tackled in small doses. With a little one, I don’t get to watch movies hardly at all anymore (unless Disney is in the title!). Once she’s in bed, I have all this other stuff I didn’t get to during the day to do, or work, or I’m just so tired I go to bed.
Saresh’s cousin saw it and really liked it. She said it was very sad though. CT – does it have a different ending in the book? I hate reading a book first and loving it and then watching the movie, because I pick it apart – even if it’s well done I still usually don’t like the movie because it’s almost always different from the book.
By: colorblindcupid on December 12, 2007
at 9:58 pm
My bf read it and thought it was great, so we went to see it, but the movie must be different from the book because we both found the movie kind of offensive (from an American values perspective). The movie seems to imply more about family always coming first whereas my bf seemed to think the book was more of a cautionary tale about the identity crisis a person goes through if he conforms to his family’s and culture’s expectations without truly identifying with them. I’d be interested in hearing what CT, thought, though, since I myself haven’t read it. I probably just didn’t like the movie because I thought Jacinda Barrett was way too good for that awful family, lol.
By: Belle on December 12, 2007
at 10:15 pm
Ha! I thought that family was way too good for that awful Jacinda Barrett.
To each their own!
By: Inbetween on December 12, 2007
at 10:48 pm
Really? What didn’t you like about her? She was a little clueless, but to me it painted the portrait of such closedminded, parochial people that they weren’t willing to look past a few faux pas (that if they were “culturally sensitive,” would realize she meant nothing by; she was simply American, but she was trying) to see that she was a kind person and a free, loving spirit who treated her son well (unlike the girl of his culture). To me, the meeting the parents scene was the classic “bash the evil white people” episode – “they should conform to our standards and we don’t have to understand them on their own terms.” My bf agreed with me, so I’m just curious what others saw in it. I mean, they do live in America. I’m not sure what they expected.
By: Belle on December 13, 2007
at 3:08 am
Okay – now I’m sufficiently intrigued to watch this movie (if nothing else I have to get in on this debate
Saresh won’t be interested though. Maybe I’ll rent it to watch with my sister or something over Christmas break.
By: colorblindcupid on December 13, 2007
at 4:08 am
I’m probably going to be burned at the stake for saying this on this blog, but remember this is merely my opinion. Ok–they live in America. So what? What does that mean? To me, when you break it down it’s a huge deal to enter someone’s home regardless of their color, class, creed, or what country you’re in. This girl clearly did not do her homework on what may be customary when entering an Indian home (homework = ask the boyfriend what’s appropriate, other Indians, etc. to gain a general sense). When she kissed his Indian parents on the cheek–being her free spirited self–my heart almost stopped. HUGE no, no. A little bit of homework would have went a long way for her. Sure she could “stand her ground” and do all things “her way” but it wouldn’t have gotten her far with the family or more importantly in her relationship. As far as the family’s homework? Um, frankly it’s their turf and their son. Like it or not, the family was a bigger shareholder in their son’s life at that point. Would it have been so inconvenient or bad for her to extend the olive branch in a way the family might better understand??
People get nervous about this, but compromise and acceptance in a relationship doesn’t mean you have to sacrifice who you are. Regardless of “who we are” (if that even is such a thing) we are constantly having to adjust the way we present ourselves in many circumstances outside of “cultural collisions.” For example, you are different when you are at work versus out with your friends on a Saturday night (I know I sure am!). I mean, I could show up at work blasted drunk and protest “This is who I am!” but it wouldn’t get me that far. Whether we like it or not we are constantly adjusting ourselves to be acceptable in many different social situations–we simply have to. Regardless of culture, I say going into a family’s home or their private space is no different than putting on yet another on of our social masks. I think when it comes to cultural stuff people get a little wiggy and fear they have to compromise their, dare I say, Americaness or “who they are.” However, in my opinion, it is really no different than presenting yet another appropriate facet of our persona as we already do in many other areas of our lives (work life verses parent life verses social life). We do these things out of respect, wanting to please, and usually to gain something (material or immaterial). How is entering someone’s home, their private, intimate space any different?
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 4:53 am
Wow! I almost don’t know how to write this response because I couldn’t disagree with you more, Belle (respectfully, of course). I don’t think Ashima or Ashoke are “closedminded, parochial people”, and in fact what I love about Ashima is how much she grows during the course of the story and moves past her original concerns about accepting a non-Indian into the family. In the scene where they meet Maxine, they are polite and respectful to her and never “bash” her or are uncivil to her once, even though it is true that Ashima in particular is not that happy that Gogol is seeing a white girl. But I would wager a lot of her worry and upset revolves around the fact that her son who, in his search for identity, has started cutting off ties with his parents. That’s painful to her (as I’m sure it would be for any mother) and this just feels like he’s pushing them away even more. The scene is really fascinating though because it is a comparison of 2 different cultures. Nothing she does is wrong by Western etiquette, but it is inappropriate in Indian etiquette. But they don’t get mad at her or throw her out or anything – I don’t get the feeling they expected her to know it. Just in a lot cases, she surprises them with how forward she is (not something they are accustomed to) and makes them uncomfortable.
Inbetween, I can understand why you wouldn’t like Maxine. Unfortunately, because of time restraints, the movie really doesn’t develop her character well. She’s much more interesting in the book. Maxine has envisioned her life perfectly, and she really needs a man that can fit into it seamlessly, and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that at all. But that just can’t work for Gogol because as much as he tries to divorce himself from his culture, he realizes as he goes through a major life crisis (I’m trying so hard not to spoil it for anyone!) that his cultural and religious rituals and practices do have meaning and a place in his life, and he just can’t give them up – it would be giving up too much of who he is. But at the same time, abiding by cultural expectations, as he does in his second marriage doesn’t turn out to be a perfect solution either. (And Mo’s character is incredibly underdeveloped too.)
Going back to CBC’s original post that started this thread, I was struck by how my situation really is a lot different from others here in that my boyfriend, while being very distinctly American, really does loves his Indian heritage, and is a practicing Hindu. For the most part, my participation in Indian customs won’t be to please his mom or dad or the Indian community at large. I’ll do them because these customs are important and meaningful to him, and I love him. Plus so far I’ve enjoyed them anyway – he takes the time to explain the deeper meaning and that makes even rituals that initially seem strange (like the hair-cutting) really beautiful to me.
Anyway, it’s late – I just wanted to say the book’s better and richer than the movie, but the movie’s still good. I just watched it again tonight and made my boyfriend watch it too, and we both cried a little (he’d probably be embarrassed if he knew I wrote that here, but it’s true.)
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 5:02 am
CT–very nice analysis and insight!
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 5:15 am
Inbetween! You’re awesome! You made some points that I couldn’t seem to articulate myself. I especially agree with your perspective on the meeting scene:
“To me, when you break it down it’s a huge deal to enter someone’s home regardless of their color, class, creed, or what country you’re in. This girl clearly did not do her homework on what may be customary when entering an Indian home (homework = ask the boyfriend what’s appropriate, other Indians, etc. to gain a general sense). When she kissed his Indian parents on the cheek–being her free spirited self–my heart almost stopped. HUGE no, no. A little bit of homework would have went a long way for her. Sure she could “stand her ground” and do all things “her way” but it wouldn’t have gotten her far with the family or more importantly in her relationship.”
She also could have listened Gogol who tries to give her some guidelines which she ignores – she touches him even though he has asked her not to. She buys food that he has already told her they won’t like because “Everybody likes truffles!” It’s not malicious, but it’s also not very sensitive or thoughtful.
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 5:16 am
**Warning: this may contain movie spoilers:**
Tonight was the first time I really got how bad she came across during the funeral scene. She’s shows up in black, which is fine in Western culture, but everyone at the funeral was in white as in accordance with Hindu tradition. She was showing a lot of skin which was just made her seem that much more inappropriate, especially when you think how painful a tragedy the family was going through. But despite her oversights, the family embraced her and welcomed her into the ceremony.
It reminded me a little of a lady who showed up to my grandfather’s formal Catholic funeral in a pink jogging suit. I know that she probably didn’t mean to be disrespectful, but it sure came across like she didn’t take my grandfather’s death very seriously.
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 5:24 am
I think Belle’s point is just that it’s fine (and perhaps nice) if you want to try to relate to people on their own terms, but that the tolerance needs to go both ways in her opinion (i.e., she doesn’t want to change herself to fit in, or doesn’t think Jacinda should have). As I mentioned in an earlier post, I think there is legitimacy in the point that the other culture doesn’t occupy the better bargaining position simply for being the other culture. I think the limitations of the “you must adapt to them” argument appear if you consider the scenario of if I moved to France and then tried to pretend it was the U.S. and everyone should “do their homework” before entering my home so as not to act too French in my presence, a rational person could argue that that’s pretty absurd. I’m not saying you two don’t have legitimate points, too, but your attitude is just a more collectivist one than an individualist one, and both are embraced by caring, rational people.
It also boils down to how much people wish to compromise for relationships. Even in relationships where the couple is homogenous in race/religion, some people will be more open to trying to impress the parents and others will have a “this is who I am; take it or leave it” feeling. So it doesn’t go without saying that *everyone* adapts to their environment. The ones who do change significantly across situations to manage impressions are called in academic literature “social chamelons” or “high self monitors,” versus low self monitors. You can spin both positively or negatively (social chameleon=culturally sensitive, socially skilled OR low integrity, fake, manipulative; low self-monitor=arrogant, insensitive or high integrity, authentic). Just wanted to point this out given what you’re discussing is rooted in different value judgments, not in facts, so you won’t be able to resolve it by debate. Both of which may be legitimate and it’s ultimately a preference.
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 13, 2007
at 6:09 am
I have nothing special or new to add to this conversation. I just wanted to say that I’m so pleased we are having these conversations. I never envisioned this for the blog – and I’m just so darn pleased. I need to go to bed now though.
By: colorblindcupid on December 13, 2007
at 6:24 am
BerkeleyGradStudent, I think you make some great points, and I’m very interested in the collectivist verses individualist point of view.
If Belle’s assertion is that tolerance is a two way street. My problem is that I don’t see the argument that Ashima and Ashoke show intolerance for Maxine (played by Jacinda Barrett) in the encounter. I also have trouble with the statement in your post that they are trying to create India in the U.S. in their home.
Think about it like this – if my brother brought Maxine home to meet my mom and Maxine home and she kissed her on the cheek that would be very uncomfortable for my mom too who is definitely not a “touchy-feely” person. Likewise, if she had called my mom “Mary” instead of “Mrs. Transplant”, my mom wouldn’t be very pleased by that either. And if my brother had informed Maxine that my mom hates lima beans, and Maxine had brought over a “lima bean casserole” because “Everybody likes lima beans!”, my mom would have excepted the gift graciously, but not been as impressed by the sentiment behind the gesture as she would be if Maxine had presented a gift based on what she really likes. And my mom is not trying to make people act less American and more Indian in her home. She is American and isn’t Indian at all.
Just because Ashoke and Ashima are Indian by heritage and that their discomfort with these gestures may be rooted in their cultural practices and upbringing, doesn’t mean that Maxine’s behavior isn’t disrespectful of their feelings in a way that goes beyond sensitivity to culture – it’s not showing them sensitivity as human beings and individuals.
And btw, my boyfriend did a lot of homework before meeting my white parents too.
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 1:59 pm
Oops – I meant to say:
“If Belle’s assertion is that tolerance is a two way street, I totally agree with that thought”
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 1:59 pm
I was waiting for Berkeley (still the Intellectual Powerhouse) to weigh in! I think it’s a nice counterpoint, however, I might urge readers to really look at how it breaks down in real life for them. The fact is, you aren’t going to be able to change any culture, let alone any one, except yourself. *Note: and you CERTAINLY DON’T have to change yourself if you don’t want to!! Furthermore, you aren’t going to be able to change a tradition that spans greater than 2,000 years. Shoot, I was just reading the Ramayana yesterday and all of those ideals of duty and dharma were etched into the collective unconscious of Indians far longer than the U.S. was even around. I think rude, cold, and racist attitutes from any source is a bunch of bunk–I agree with you BG. However, paying a little attention to context and what your objectives are can help one achieve perhaps a more desired outcome. Or EVEN open up a whole new world of learning! Eh, in my short experience of life a little cooling my jets, taking a step back, and maintaining dignity in the face of cold, mean attitudes goes a heck of a long way. You don’t have to kill everyone with kindness, just a steady, pleasent presence. In my opinion, this doesn’t mean you have to compromise who you are. It actually kind of makes you feel…good about yourself too. It’s funny, when you do this people, regardless of where they’re from, often come around. That’s just how I try to roll, no one else has to. And no, I can’t prove that through academic debate, but that’s my story and it’s worked for me!
Hey if BG is the Intellectual Powerhouse, can I be Dr. Phil? (I can’t stand Dr. Phil, but while I’m not much of an academic debater, my life experiences are relatively up to par
)
And, CBC, THANK YOU for giving many of us this forum to open up and discuss. Wow! I feel like I’m in a classroom again, I love it.
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 2:29 pm
OK, and my guy Rajiv wrote me a response after sending him this thread. Annoyingly, he is much more thorough and articulate in his analysis than I was. I’ll post it now (WARNING POTENTIAL MOVIE SPOILER!!!).
I don’t think the movie paints Jacinda Barrett as good or bad. In fact, I think the girlfriend is painted more negatively in the book, if I recall correctly. She’s sort of a spoiled white New Englander, and her parents seem more interested in the novelty of Gogol’s Indianhood than in actually understanding what that means.
In the movie, the girlfriend is more two-dimensional, but the fact that she was clueless was her downfall. Gogol, in trying to find his own identity, did what he could to blend in with American values and customs, and certainly met her parents on their terms. Yet when Jacinda (Max, I think her character’s name was) met his parents and when she came to the funeral, she had not made any effort to try to meet them on theirs. To their credit, Gogol’s parents may have seemed uncomfortable by it, but they never seemed to treat her badly or judge her for it (my memory of this part of it may be hazy…) Consider what smirks may have passed among Jacinda’s parents if Gogol came to Max’s house and proceeded to walk around barefoot or greeted them with folded hands. Gogol rejected Max because she didn’t seem to understand that there was this other side to him, that he couldn’t be a white, middle-class New Englander. Indeed, his relationship with her in the first place may have stemmed from his own misguided notion that he could, but his father’s death made him realize he couldn’t. And while poor Max was trying to be a good girlfriend, she was not trying to understand his roots at all. To say that they live in America and should be flexible to Max’s needs is unfair when Max is not making any effort to understand them. This is not to say that everyone in America needs to conform to them, but the person who is seeking to become part of their family might do well to make a little effort. It’s not the reaction of a parochial, closed-minded family. Rather, it is the anxiety of a family which has had to scrape and compromise to maintain a semblance of their culture and tradition, only to be reminded how little it is worth to others.
I challenge the notion that the movie is all “family first” though. Certainly, Gogol’s parents made a number of sacrifices for him, and so they are painted in a favorable light simply by virtue of that fact. This is true in both the book and the movie. But when Gogol tries to abide by his family wishes and meets Maushimi to make his mother happy, he gets burned again. This time because the girl his parents have set him up with and dreamed he would marry is a woman in the throes of her own crisis, and she ends up cheating on him. And in both the book and the movie, it is very briefly noted that Gogol’s sister marries a non-Indian. And what happens in the end? Gogol “finally feels free,” presumably to forge his own path, while his mother returns home to India. They find peace in finally owning their own identities.
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 2:34 pm
Rereading this part of his response (as this is a part of who Rajiv is too) gave me chills:
Rather, it is the anxiety of a family which has had to scrape and compromise to maintain a semblance of their culture and tradition, only to be reminded how little it is worth to others.
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 2:36 pm
Inbetween, you’ve got one amazing guy there – what a beautiful thoughtful analysis! I think he really captures the thrust of the story brilliantly. The part that you’ve highlighted reminds me of my boyfriend’s parents and makes me appreciate them all the more – they’ve overcome immense poverty and terrible setbacks to get where they are. The notion that people might view the traditions and culture that brings them comfort and provides meaning to their struggle as of little or no value makes me very sad.
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 2:56 pm
And, Ooohh I can’t wait until we start talking about the individualist vs. collectivist mindset/cultural underpinnings….!!
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 3:04 pm
“Rather, it is the anxiety of a family which has had to scrape and compromise to maintain a semblance of their culture and tradition, only to be reminded how little it is worth to others.”
This is what I keep in mind when I think about my boyfriend’s family, and what I try to explain to my own parents when they don’t get what the big deal is. They’ve had to change and learn a lot of things in order to live in the US – it is only fair that if I want to live in their family I should try to meet them halfway and learn some things too.
By: KC on December 13, 2007
at 3:07 pm
Yeah, R’s ability to look at his culture objectively, embrace it lovingly, and empathize with others (like us!) trying to understand it is truly astounding
. Certainly makes me want to learn and stretch myself more. It’s so cute, he doesn’t want to read the comments sections out of respect for my e-mode of ‘venting.’
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 3:16 pm
Since I haven’t seen the movie, I can’t comment on that (or the book), but I will say that I think the “worth” of another person’s culture is relative. I think the sentiment is definitely true – “the anxiety of a family which has had to scrape and compromise to maintain … their culture and tradition” because I feel that anxiety.
But, they did move to a country outside their own culture. Much of that anxiety is self-induced because they are choosing to do the scraping and compromising – and I’m not saying they have to give up their culture and assimilate, but perhaps not clawing at it to the point that it’s so stressful to them would be useful – find a way to merge more into the culture they’ve moved into.
I don’t think it’s that non-Indian people believe their culture to be of little worth – it’s just not their own culture, so they don’t think of it much at all – or maybe more in a “yeah for you, you’re Indian – I think that’s great,” but beyond that they may not be interested in discovering the deeper roots of it, much less helping that family claw so hard onto trying to maintain that culture and tradition.
Sometimes, I feel offended at how HARD my in-laws “scrape and compromise” to maintain their culture and tradition. How it plays out in daily life and interacting with us (see my new post, last paragraph!) feels like a slap in the face to accepting any of the culture of the new country they live in. It makes simple interactions hard and painful sometimes, like the Grandparents party my daughter’s preschool threw at Thanksgiving. The children made a “feast” to serve their grandparents with muffins and ice cream – neither of which the in-laws ate. Saresh was very angry about this, and when he questioned them as to why they did not eat the muffins, it was a cultural thing. Yes – a cultural thing that a 3-year-old who worked hard to make her grandparents muffins didn’t understand (nor does her mother, but I don’t even bother asking anymore). She sees everybody else’s grandparents eating the muffins. As DD gets older, the scraping and compromising is going to become harder and harder to explain and for her to understand.
Though I’ve softened in my views and grown wiser, I used to get very angry – sort of a patriotic American stance, when Saresh and I were dating. I sometimes felt like they were “using” America for what they could get out of it, all the while holding it in disdain. Nothing’s that black and white, and I wish it had been that simple. However, I still get an inkling of that old feeling now and again, because I feel my own culture has little worth to them. But I don’t think they are attributing a level of worth at all to my culture, just as I wasn’t attributing a worth level to theirs – just thinking only of their own.
By: colorblindcupid on December 13, 2007
at 3:20 pm
I hear you CBC. I have never been down that path and experienced what you have. Who knows what will happen if I do? I guess in any relationship, no matter how much “info” we gather, or however many boundaries we set early on, at some point we just have to take a calculated leap and trust our partner. I can say from past serious relationships (with corn fed white boys) that in-laws/relatives can be total thorns regardless of what culture they’re from. Rajiv and I both agree that you have every right to vent and be frustrated with the personal experiences you’ve had with Indian culture. I’m glad that Saresh has got your back and that you are dealing with your situation in a way that’s best for you! Again, this blog forum has been an amazingly cool way to flesh out such issues for me and obviously for many others.
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 3:39 pm
CBC, as always, I think your post is bright and perceptive.
I just wanted to say that I have a hard time with the notion of “an American culture” in general, because to me it’s so indefinable – every time I try to think a practice or ritual that IS uniquely American culture, I find another reason why it is not. Maybe it’s a case of “can’t see the forest through the trees.”
Anyway, when I start thinking about it like that, I can’t decide why the rituals and practices of my boyfriend’s parents or even my boyfriend should be thought of as not representative of American culture even if they are also a part of Indian. Although they weren’t born here, they American citizens, they all give back to our country by paying taxes and to American society at large by participating in volunteer work that benefits their local community (which they also consider to be important to their religion). What makes my culture as a white person and natural born citizen more American than theirs?
Just something I’m grappling with…
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 3:44 pm
“I can say from past serious relationships (with corn fed white boys) that in-laws/relatives can be total thorns regardless of what culture they’re from.”
You got that right! Some of my friends have HORRID in laws. Makes my situation look downright cozy. I have one friend who’s husband called her parents to ask their permission to ask their daughter to marry him. Her dad wasn’t home so her mom answered and he asked her. She said NO. Can you even imagine? What do you say after that? How does he explain that to his fiance? They co-exist now peaceably (most of the time), but there’s no feelin’ the love, that’s for sure.
By: colorblindcupid on December 13, 2007
at 3:45 pm
Btw, apologies for all my typos and grammatical errors – I’m in the middle of finals and am suffering from sleep deprivation.
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 3:45 pm
“I can say from past serious relationships (with corn fed white boys) that in-laws/relatives can be total thorns regardless of what culture they’re from.”
Yes! My cousin’s wife and mom (both white) are currently engaged in WWIII.
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 3:47 pm
Ok gang, I asked Rajiv if I could post his message to me because I think it’s pretty worthwhile. He didn’t intend it to be posted, but he is also enjoying our discourse! If you get something out of it, cool! If not, no worries
. I know…all the mad posting from me, but it is genuinely cool too discuss these things. Also, he thought the ice cream incident was bunk on the rents part!
Here it is:
I read CBC’s comment, too, and she raises some interesting points. I certainly don’t mean to diminish the xenophobia that Indian parents can have, and sometimes this jealous guarding of tradition can manifest as outright contempt for the culture they are in. This is often where the second generation succeeds better, since they are in a position to understand American traditions without the prejudice that the first generation has, and so adapt these values to their life. But even for the second generation, convincing the first generation of such values is a difficult task. Not just in Indian culture, this is a universal immigrant experience. Fear of losing your culture, the shock of very different traditions, abandoning family, and trying to overcome your own instilled notions are big things for people to overcome, and immigrants succeed to varying degrees. And yes, sometimes Indians can be xenophobic and racist because they a) can’t shed preconceived notions from their upbringing and b) have so much fear from these preconceived notions that they don’t seek out the experiences and relationships that would shatter such notions. I make no excuses for such entrenchment and self-isolation, but I do have some sympathy for it. Some people fear public speaking to such a degree that they panic and/or faint at the notion, some are anxious but able to manage it if forced into the situation, and some are at ease doing it. Indian people exist along a similar spectrum in terms of seeking new experiences and relationships. But because many come from a more affluent background, no Indian person is ever forced out of their comfort zone, so the only people who are easily able to integrate into this country are the small minority that are naturally comfortable seeking new experiences and relationships.
I sometimes refer to Indians as “new Jews” since we most seem to parallel the Jewish experience of 60-70 years ago. We are immigrants coming to a new country, fairly educated and functioning in a relatively higher social status, but trying to maintain our traditions and sense of community. And the emphasis on being a doctor, history of arranged marriages, emphasis on finding a mate of the same ethnicity is so prevalent in both! And, we are slowly starting to break into the entertainment business!! (I don’t mean to insult anyone Jewish, I just think the parallels are kind of cool!)
So in short, I do agree that the behavior of some first generation Indians can be inconsiderate, even if unintentionally. I think it stems from ignorance, not malice, but that still doesn’t excuse it.
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 6:04 pm
American culture is generally understood to be defined by the principles and rights of the Constitution and by an individualistic orientation (although of course there are exceptions, but that is the point – it is acceptable in America to be an exception). The rights to free speech and expression, to self-determination, and to pursue happiness and self-actualization, as well as the extraordinary opportunity for upward mobility that exists here moreso than anywhere else in the world, are considered to be “American culture.”
So, the comment that you think other cultures could be considered “American,” is in a some way correct because the fact that they can practice their way of life so freely here while also being in the extreme minority is distinctly American (or perhaps “western,” but that’s another topic).
I think the asymmetries in tolerance arise because American culture has a high degree of tolerance and respect for individual choices built into it. A reasonable person could argue that they are taking advantage of the country, as CBC said she once felt, because they’re absorbing the benefits of that tolerance and those individual rights, but they overlook that and often fail to confer those individual rights on, say their guests, their children’s spouses, etc., who does not wish to take part in their culture even if he/she respects their right to practice it themselves. If we didn’t have that liberty, to benefit from the economic opportunity here, they would have to conform more. But, fortunately for them, they don’t have to.
As I said before, some people may wish to try to become “part of their spouse’s family” but adopting another culture, but people who grew up in highly individualistc families may disagree that they need to change or accomodate, because they are willing to accept and understand people as they are and expect that in return.
One could also argue that this country has excelled due to it’s individualism (e.g., Ayn Rand’s work), which would suggest that paying taxes isn’t as valuable as instilling these “American values” in your children, but I think many reasonable people would argue that having some collectivists is beneficial, too. I do think it’s obvious, at least in the posts here, though that many Indians are by definition hypocritical, however, because they benefit daily from the individual rights and liberty bestowed upon them, but conveniently overlook this in order to deny those rights to other people. For instance, if your SO wore Indian clothes regularly, would your parents suggest that he wear American clothes when he came to visit or to their events (even if they were ultra WASPs, with, say, a ten year tradition of tennis whites on Easter)? I’m not passing judgment on wanting to assimilate to Indian culture, but I’m arguing that the protection of the rights of those who don’t wish to are in need of protection and that it’s difficult to deny that the asymmetry and hypocrisy exists.
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 13, 2007
at 6:26 pm
In a sentence, it boils down to whether you believe liberty is an inalienable right, or one you drop at the door of your in-law’s home.
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 13, 2007
at 6:29 pm
Sorry, triple-post, but I thought I should add that I realize everyone here who wishes to embrace their in-law’s culture has the best of intentions (being highly sensitive, keep the family united, etc.) and thinks other people should aim for those values, too. But I think when you adopt such a relativist stance in order to fit in and make people comfortable, it’s an extremely slippery slope in a very dangerous direction. If you argue, “their culture doesn’t respect liberty,” you are allowing one of the founding values of this country to be alienated. That right to liberty was radical and pioneering and stopped wars between religions and ethnicities. Even if you consider liberty an American value, if you deny Americans’ rights to it within their own country, no matter who they marry, you should consider the implications of what type of a country you’ll live in…one where the dominant immigrant community sets the standards and oppresses and exiles those who don’t obey. Relativism is dangerous….
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 13, 2007
at 6:50 pm
AWESOME INSIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In this context I personally believe enforcing “liberty as my inalienable right” upon entering someone’s private space as a bunch of ineffective bunk. Thus, I think about all the learning I would have missed out on upon entering a Traditional Mongol or even an Evangelical Christian’s home
. But you are correct that every person has a right to make that choice to do that, to what extent, or not at all. I’m glad you articulated that for me. And SINCE I live in America I CAN make that choice. What a privilege that is. I mean, BG, is it OK for me to pick cherry things I like out of individualist culture though? For example, I love that there are so many opportunities here not found elsewhere and that I have the freedom to even SAY these things. However, I also think individualism can go to an extreme (i.e. imposing a Jeffersonian idea of democracy on other countries or not budging my “inalienable rights” when considering the immigrant experience, etc.). I dig collective aspects inherent in eastern systems as well (perhaps you could speak to those?). Hummm, do my beliefs this simply mean I’m a leftist? Or..what?
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 6:53 pm
The battling between collectivist mindset and individualism probably comes into play in the political sphere, in right vs. left.
I agree that when entering someone else’s home, it’s polite to behave in a way that’s appropriate to the hosts. BUT THAT WORKS BOTH WAYS. I think that’s always been the rub here – we whiteys can dress up in saris and try to kowtow as much as possible, but we don’t expect others to do the same in our home. At least I don’t. I always have the feeling that I have to accommodate everyone else but I don’t feel that reciprocation in return sometimes.
And this is leads to other questions in my mind. Can you even IMAGINE, if a white girl brought home a black man to her parents, and the parents flipped out, called him a “gangster”, and threatened to disown their daughter?
Can you imagine the outrage (justifiably) on the part of the black man and his family, friends, and even the community at large?
No doubt the NAACP, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and the black panthers would be paraded across the television to rail against white oppression, if this happened publicly.
But when another group treats a white person that way, it’s all about “understanding their fears” and “learning their culture”, blah blah blah.
It just gets really tiring after a while, and feels more than a bit ridiculous.
By: chineseambassador on December 13, 2007
at 7:11 pm
Yeah, really good points, CA. Eh, I kind of think as long as people don’t have an agenda to convert me to something people can come into my home just as they are. I don’t really have a lot of expectations myself as long as they are decent (I know that’s relative). However, I do respect others who do have certain expectations (i.e. I’ve been known to participate in a dinner prayer in a Christian home
). Furthermore, in accommodating such I do not personally feel it imposes on my inalienable rights. Man, I have a lot of Indian and international friends and have met several of their parents. Personally I’ve never had the experience of them treating me poorly because I’m white. Often, I sense more of a fear of the unknown, or even an unnecessary and sort of heartbreakingly “royal treatment” because I AM white. Both reactions usually dissipate with time. I guess it’s been pretty brutal for other people out there…?
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 7:31 pm
Generally it’s the right that opposes extreme individualism and favors a more family-oriented, tradition-embracing attitude in its place – do you consider yourself conservative? They tend to accept inequality more easily and to believe in free markets as well. The left is marked by a concern for equality and about the externalities of free markets, leading them to prefer a “bigger” government that offers a safety net for people. Many of the Founding Fathers were libertarians (although that’s totally different from the modern Libertarian party), so these are libertarian values we’re discussing and which our country is founded on. Anyway, I think it’s perfectly fine and normal to cherry pick parts of cultures and religions that you like, and to define your own values about how you want to treat your in-laws or what you’re willing to do to keep a family in harmony. The problems just arise when people can’t “agree to disagree” or “live and let live,” and start proclaiming their values as universal and right for everyone. I think that’s why our schools try to teach children about the Constitution so early – to preserve the precious things about living here, people have to accept that liberty is inalienable, even if they disagree with other people so much that they’re ready to beat that person with a cane (as happened among the Founding Fathers, actually, lol). That is also what has concerned many people in every political party about too little a separation between church and state, trying to legislate morality, etc. If you deny liberty and things flip in a direction not favorable toward you, you end up oppressed.
Collectivism holds that the primary unit of moral value is not the individual, but the group. It often makes strong distinctions between in-groups and out-groups and often promotes competition between those factions. It also expects the individual to sacrifice his/her personal goals for the good of the group. Individualists oppose it because they argue that humans are ends in themselves, not tools for any purpose, particularly not the tool to be used for the ends of a group. It’s really at odds with capitalism because capitalism is based on the principle of individual rights and private property. Communism is a much more collectivist goverment style (I’m not saying you promote this; just pointing out that it has both moral as well as political implications, depending on how far you take it). The values you see in eastern cultures generally have these differences from individualism:
*Promoting interdependence and group success rather than independence and individual achievement
*Promoting adherence to authority and norms rather than independent thought and personal choice
*Associated with stable, hierarchical roles rather than egalitarian relationships
*Associated with shared property rather than individual property.
This is of course a stereotype and cultures can’t be boiled down into either individualism or collectivism completely, but it is a general outline of the differences in values.
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 13, 2007
at 7:35 pm
I imagine what you like about it is the selflessness within the family. It does seem most valuable and noble there (rather than as a political system or a set of values to be imposed on others). Children certainly benefit from having collectivist parents at times.
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 13, 2007
at 7:38 pm
Well since my husband hates communism and won’t even go back to China anymore, and freaks out if the government proposes anything that smacks of socialism (i.e. lots more government programs and higher taxes for them) – I’d say we’re conservative.
I know the evils of communism just from reading history, but Ang and his family have lived through those evils, so it makes us a bit more vehement in our opposition.
This is funny and off-topic, but what the heck….Ang told me when he was young and new to the U.S., Bill Clinton was running for president. He said that he heard Clinton espousing some entitlement program that would benefit minorities or the poor (can’t remember which one, all Ang knew was that he was poor, an immigrant, and any kind of handout sounded fabulous to him).
He decided (in his 12-year old wisdom) that he was a Democrat.
Fast forward 15 years, and Ang has grown up, made it through college, gotten a job, and is finally more comfortable.
Suddenly he realizes that he’s paying a lot of taxes, and there’s this thing called welfare where people sit around and collect checks for having lots of babies out of wedlock (simplified, I know, but bear with me)
So suddenly he starts reading all these books on communism and Chairman Mao, and listening to political radio shows, etc etc.
Suddenly he says “I’m not a Democrat”.
lol I was like “Okay. that’s fine.”
I just thought it was funny how he morphed from a Bill Clinton lover to a more libertarian viewpoint (he even listens to Michael Savage on the radio now!)
I wondered if this was a typical immigrant experience. I know many immigrant groups are Democratic for those reasons – handouts, collectivist mindset, and the fact that so many of them come from socialist countries and are more comfortable with it.
By: chineseambassador on December 13, 2007
at 7:55 pm
Sorry that I’m a huge pain in a** triple poster today, but I just thought I should add that people can be individualists, but act like collectivists (although it doesn’t really go the other way, as CA observed, and frankly I am on a personal level very sympathetic to CA’s points; I think it’s likely that we’ve taken American tolerance so far that it’s become one-way and we don’t always encourage constructive dialogue and criticism about the behavior of minority groups). So, anyway, Inbetween, you could make sacrifices for your family and put them above your own needs and believe in doing that, but be an individualist in the sense that you think no one else can tell you to do that, and by asserting that you can draw the line and stop when you’ve reached your threshhold. Most people in the U.S. are individualists, but believe in some of the collectivist values and *choose* to act in those ways at times (but hopefully without trying to force other people to).
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 13, 2007
at 8:00 pm
I should mention that Minnesota is a good case of this. My mom’s family are Norwegian and like most of Minnesota, immigrants from Scandinavia are accustomed to the socialist government. Hence MN is heavily democratic and they have high taxes and lots of state programs.
So my mom said that growing up in MN, nobody had a pot to piss in, but the local high school had an olympic swimming pool, and the kids all skipped class to smoke weed in the bathrooms. She said during class, if you went to the bathroom, you had to step over the bodies of all the girls who were stoned and lying all over the floor.
just trying to picture this it’s like “what country did you grow up in?” lol
By: chineseambassador on December 13, 2007
at 8:00 pm
Ha! No I have never been called a conservative in my life
. I definitely have liberal social values. In some instances I’ve been called a Marxist (to no offense). Politically…things get hazy for me. But yea, I really dig how Indian parents tend to value education and close child rearing. In my experience, they got the whole child attachment thing down even if they “over-shoot” sometimes. There are a lot of selfless, “do it for the group” notions instilled through their collective values. I find these refreshingly nice (I grew up with a very detached, uninvolved mother–the other end of the spectrum). I also think the joint-family/collective influence can go to the extreme and make it difficult for kids and individuals to ‘become who they really are.’ Thus, group expectations can override important individual goals and needs. For me, a solid nuclear family that comes first is paramount. Giving space for my kids to ‘be who they are’ is essential. Boundaries and limits on the influence of in-laws are essential as well (I want my chance to learn and grow as a show-running, Mama Bear some day!). This is where I conveniently cherry pick, and maintain my stance, in the orchard of individualism. Do I know if I can achieve this with my Indian guy considering his conservative, very pro-joint familial context? I’m not sure yet. Time will tell…
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 8:16 pm
Berkley feel free to quadruple post. I clutter up these threads with lots of extra off-topic crap so I think we can tolerate your (on-topic) educated input. ha.
By: chineseambassador on December 13, 2007
at 8:21 pm
Hey, I’m loving this discussion–thanks for your perspective BG & CA. Yeah, Marxism seemed like a great idea in my college class, but when I visited China and Russia I had sort of had a gut level rejection to all notions associated with it.
By: Inbetween on December 13, 2007
at 8:24 pm
BerkeleyGrad, thanks for your thoughts on what “American culture” – it’s really helping me take a step back and examine ideas from a broader perspective.
And Inbetween, I just wanted to tell you that I relate to you on so many levels. The way Indian parents “value education and close child rearing” appeals to me too, as well as the seriousness with which they regard marriage as a lifelong commitment and the importance they give to the role of family in the collective sense. At the same time, I have very progressive liberal social values. I’d like to think I’m cherry-picking in the “individualism orchard” too, as you say, while striving to make it work with my Indian guy and his family.
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 13, 2007
at 8:53 pm
Ah, a Marxist! Well sorry for mistaking you for a conservative, then.
It is interesting, this conflict between Republican’s free market yet collectivist family values (which were what made me ask you that). But it just goes to show that “left” and “right” distinctions only capture part of the ideological spectrum. I remember talking with people in college once about Marx, and we all agreed that on the surface, Communism can sound great. The criticisms Marx levels at capitalism are fair – it does perpetuate inequality, it can oppress workers, and alienate them from the products of their labor. The problem is just, as you guys said, that we don’t have anything better. So we go with capitalism and error on the side of too much liberty because it’s the best we have, and leaning in the opposite direction can be disastrous. It is interesting to me, though, that you guys promote openness to experience and other cultures on the part of Americans (toward Indians, in this case), but why does it not bother you then that Indians are so often closed to experience (as illustrated by many of these stories)? I saw that you liked someone’s quote above about their anxiety concerning others’ lack of appreciation for their values, but do you really feel bad for them that they have to live in an ideologically diverse world? Don’t we all have to live with people different from us, who don’t entirely understand us or respect what we’re about?
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 13, 2007
at 11:31 pm
Actually I’m kinda curious about the dichotomy between progressives’ views on cultures.
For instance, it seems that the progressives here value the strong values of family and child-rearing in Indian culture, which many other groups also have (such as Christians).
However, the prevailing opinion about evenagelicals amongst progressives tends to be one of contempt, while at the same time they embrace other cultures which are much stricter (thinking of Indian, but also muslim/arab “culture” which is much harsher by far.)
I know you guys may not subscribe to all of those views so you don’t have to defend the left to me or anything – I’ve just always been curious about this seemingly contradictory stance I’ve noticed elsewhere and wondered if anyone has insight on that. No pressure, though. lol
By: chineseambassador on December 13, 2007
at 11:55 pm
I originally wrote a different response, but in an attempt to foster a sense of camaraderie rather than contempt on this forum I decided to answer just this question:
Don’t we all have to live with people different from us, who don’t entirely understand us or respect what we’re about?
We sure do. Personally I try and understand what individuals are all about regardless of where they are from or what they believe. That’s why I love narrative and story-telling so much. Rather than focusing on difference, I generally try to extract positives and commonalities from my interactions with anyone really. Furthermore, I hope individuals feel empowered to make choices that are best for themselves while understanding those choices might not be best for me.
I’ve lived a pretty fortunate life so my mission really isn’t to demand that others respect and understand me. Personally, I think obtaining respect and understanding is much harder for people other than myself. If being understood is an issue for an immigrant Indian, I’m listening. A white male who was molested as a child? I’m all ears. Any religious person who has been persecuted for their beliefs? What’s your story.
I confess, I do tend to be more empathetic towards and am vested in helping socially vulnerable populations such as ethnic minorities, immigrants, women, and children. I suppose if I were to classify myself as anything it would be first and foremost a humanitarian.
Other than that, I don’t think I need to justify my attraction to Indian culture. Some of it I just get and I’m able to understand it to a fairly large extent (as I now have learned)! I’m not sure I want to merge my life with it just yet, but for the most part I my experience has been very positive. I hope others will continue to share theirs.
By: Inbetween on December 14, 2007
at 3:11 am
And, thanks CaliforniaTransplant. Are you a backpacker? You seem like one
.
By: Inbetween on December 14, 2007
at 3:17 am
have you read “The Jungle” by Upton Sinclair?
It was the most horrific immigrant story I ever read, and he had me completely sold on the hardships of immigrants. Until the last couple of chapters, where suddenly he had the main character jump up on a soapbox, and begin ranting directly to the reader about how socialism is the answer to all the problems.
I was bummed, because up until that point the story had me – and then it just fell apart. I wonder if anyone else had the same reaction to that work…
I agree, story is powerful.
By: chineseambassador on December 14, 2007
at 3:32 am
I have enjoyed reading everyone’s post here. It is quite enlightening. I agree with Califoria on how my mom would react since I come from a VERY non-touchy, feely family. The girl Maxine was…I’ll just say inconsiderate, as Gogol pointed out, it wasn’t about her. Yes, she was trying to be supportive, but really didn’t ask Gogol his thoughts on the whole funeral thing. I like this website after searching out to find more about Hinduism. I like a guy that is from India, but he tells me that he can’t tell his friends that we are dating because dating in India is TOTALLY different than dating in America. That to us, it is very casual, but to them, very serious. Out of consideration for my feelings, he tried to break things off, but discovered he liked me to much to do so. So we’ll see where it takes us. I come from a sort of strange household myself. I am what I would call a mutt LOL. I have a very diverse cultural heritage, but mostly am of Native American Cherokee/Choctaw and English descent. I got the white British skin and light hair. My parents are both dark with black/near black hair. My brothers both got the dark hair and get dark in the sun easily..not me. A lot of times, I have been mistakenly considered adopted, but I am not, just the luck of the genes. My Native American heritage was suppressed by my grandparents…nearly all things. It is strange to see both sides of 2 cultures because Native Americans don’t always believe or act the same as other US citizens. I digress, anyway, my guy-friend is very accepting of my beliefs and I of his..we mesh more than we originally thought because I don’t think he is strict Hindu. But anyway, thanks for everyone’s insights and opinions. It has answered questions I had.
By: ara0062 on December 14, 2007
at 6:06 am
That’s awesome, ara. Yeah, this has been a good thread. Kind of like one of those late night philosophizing sessions in college!
I will say one more thing, I have said numerous times here that racism is wrong from any source. I jumped right in to defend CBC’s right to tell her story when she was accused of the big R word. Furthermore, I have been empathetic and supportive of everyone’s right to express frustration, anger, or annoyances about their interracial relationship. This doesn’t mean my experience will be or should be the same. It is abundantly clear that we all bring something very different to this interracial dating table.
Yes, Berkeley, most stories here have expressed frustration over dealing with families from various ethnic backgrounds–mine included. I hear that. In bringing up ‘The Namesake’ I thought of it as presenting yet another narrative or possibility. I hope this forum remains open to expressing experiences and possibilities different from their own. I think the Indian immigrant experience (specific to the family one is dealing with) is something folks here might be wise to consider if they want to date someone from that family.
Before, I smugly thought Max (Jacinda Barrett) was an ignorant American. Now, BG you have pointed out she is more of an individualist protective of her rights. And, it is her every right to be that way.
That’s all, I know I’VE exhausted this thread!
By: Inbetween on December 14, 2007
at 3:05 pm
“I like a guy that is from India, but he tells me that he can’t tell his friends that we are dating because dating in India is TOTALLY different than dating in America.”
Wow, ara0062! – I can’t tell you how much I can relate to that! For me, that’s been the toughest aspect of dating an Indian man. I will say that it makes it that much more exciting when he finally does tell them about you.
CA, the idea that “the prevailing opinion about evangelicals amongst progressives tends to be one of contempt” isn’t true for me or any of the progressives I know personally. My best friend is an evangelical Christian, and I have nothing but love and respect her and her beliefs. In fact, I go with her to her church sometimes because I love the singing and the ritualistic aspects of the service and the sense of community that you find there. It’s interesting to me that both my boyfriend and my best friend have a very strong sense of faith in very different religions, but I think their underlying core values are very similar – they get along incredibly well. Anyway, there are things that my friend and I disagree about, but it’s never gotten in the way of the respect or love that we have for each other. And I try to extend that respect (rather than contempt) to anyone regardless of their beliefs, in the hope that they extend the same respect to me.
And BerkeleyGrad to your question: “why does it not bother you then that Indians are so often closed to experience (as illustrated by many of these stories)?” It does bother me! But it’s also true that my only experience in hearing about this intolerance and cruelty is through the stories I’ve heard on this blog. In my own realm of personal experience, my boyfriend’s Indian family (both immediate and extended) have received me and my boyfriend’s white brother-in-law with tremendous warmth and kindness. I also have a white cousin who married an American-born Indian man of Punjabi descent who has been treated very well by his family. And I have friend born and raised in India, who just married a white woman and, his Indian Hindu father has been very supportive (his mom, sadly, is deceased). That doesn’t mean that the stories of intolerance people have told here are any less true or any less horrible – it’s just that I think not all Indian people are closed to new experiences, and I’m interested in giving people the benefit of doubt until they prove me right or wrong.
And Inbetween: I’m not a backpacker, but I am an avid hiker! It’s a lot harder to enjoy that hobby here in Illinois than it was in California – there just aren’t enough hills ‘round these parts!
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 14, 2007
at 4:14 pm
wow that’s a new “story” for me, as far as progressives and their views on Christians. I get the feeling that the contempt I’m reading is coming from some people on the Left who scream the loudest on the internet. (And the internet can sometimes make fringe beliefs appear to be mainstream, depending on how big their “web presence” looks). Interesting.
and since CBC isn’t here, I forgot I need to be the welcome wagon lol. So welcome ara, to our little corner of the web.
By: chineseambassador on December 14, 2007
at 4:51 pm
This Evangelical Christian rocks my world
:
http://www.wittenburgdoor.com/rolf_potts
By: Inbetween on December 14, 2007
at 5:19 pm
Inbetween, thank you for sharing this! (I’ve already been bitten by the travel bug – makes my longing so much more intense!)
I love it when Potts says, “This learning experience needn’t be limited to the Christian world. You can learn a lot about faith in general from sincere Buddhists or Muslims or Sikhs. This doesn’t mean you have to become a Buddhist, Muslim or Sikh; I’m just saying that if you approach them with respect as a person of faith, there’s a lot both parties can learn.”
By: CaliforniaTransplant on December 14, 2007
at 5:28 pm
CT: Absolutely!
and
Absolutely!
CT & ara, about the whole not telling friends/family thing…first I’m sure you know it’s common. The reasons can be different for every situation. After Rajiv and I were exclusive he had no problem telling his friends/cousins. But, I would not meet his parents until a pending engagement. I know it sounds a little crazy, but for me, I KNOW the s*** is going to hit the fan when he tells them SO I’m kind of enjoying the *parent free bliss* CBC once described right now. More importantly for me though, it gives R and I time to hammer out all our stuff and get on the same page. That way we can hopefully be a United Front when the heartbroken Telugu family tears start rolling…
/:)
By: Inbetween on December 14, 2007
at 6:40 pm
yeah. and Rolf is hot too.
perspective, you know.
By: chineseambassador on December 14, 2007
at 6:51 pm
LOL, thanks for the welcoming. I have some very close friend who have been very supportive. One has already gone through what I am experiencing now. She always gives me insight and encouragement. She herself is a Catholic Hispanic-American who will be in 1 week tying the knot to her fiance of Buddist Vietnamese origins. She really relates and helps me out when I need to vent frustration. I have not told my parents that I am dating someone from another country. I do not feel that it would bother my mom..since she has the most mixed background of my two parents, but I feel like my dad will probably “kill” me LOL. Mom did a great job raising us kids to try and be tolerant of all people, as she herself was raised to be, but unfortunately for my dad, though I love him dearly, he has slowly changed over the years to not be so racist. He really has made great strides, but s*** will hit the fan if me and my guy make as far as most of you have. I find GREAT encouragement from your own personal experiences though, so thanks again!!!
By: ara0062 on December 15, 2007
at 3:53 am
CA, I’m not sure I know what you mean about the dichotomy of progressives’ views on cultures. Any commentator in particular? I may just not read much of the political commentary on the web, outside of the NYT, but I was just curious. In general, there is an interesting debate in the political ideology literature concerning whether the “rigidity of the right” hypothesis is true or whether the fear of ambiguity and need for reduction of uncertainy through dogmatism and authoritarianism extends to all extreme political views. Recently, the literature tends to find the latter, so basically Communists and Marxists in Russia were just as authoritarian and closed-minded as neocons here, whereas more moderate right or left wing views tend to be more open-minded and see their perspectives as right for them, but a personal choice others should make for themselves given the tension and trade-offs between competing values. Anyway. It was just the interesting contrast between seeking more freedom from government but less personal liberty that I was saying is interesting about the right.
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 16, 2007
at 2:01 am
I’m not clear on why Inbetween is getting bent out of shape and talking about writing contemptuous posts. I’m not asking you to defend your views or your attraction to the culture. I don’t really see the logic in your response(?). I was making a counterpoint to the quote above that essentially justified the dogmatism and intolerance we have discussed by emphasizing Indians’ anxiety and alienation from their new environment. I’m not arguing that people shouldn’t be empathetic to that. I’m just making the point that our empathy and understanding of psychological needs doesn’t necessarily imply that the behavior is therefore justified. Some egregious behavior has erupted from some very sad and poignant emotions to which most people would relate.
I agree that many of the negative experiences CBC and others have mentioned on the site stem from deep fears and anxiety and that it is sad to think of people feeling misunderstood and threatened because others don’t appreciate the way they live their lives and their tradition. I’m just pointing out that although this may be a profound experience, it’s one most of us experience but learn to live with, in some form (Americans in other countries certainly do as well) because unless we are part of a particular church or other ideological community, the values and traditions we hold most dear are not necessarily understood by many other people. I was also just pointing out, given that you had expressed views with normative implications (e.g., thinking that standing your ground about your personal liberty in another person’s home being bunk), that the people to which you seem sympathetic often do exacty what you disagree with.
This is all an intellectual discussion intended to help us think fairly. I’m not trying to generalize to all Indians or argue that empathy is bad. I think we need to be careful to avoid polarizing our views by sifting ourselves into opposing camps that rationalize our positions. I’m just making what I see as reasonable counterarguments. I could do that for the other perspective, too, if someone wants to express it. I think it’s great that you’re empathetic and interested in people’s stories. I have just noted that people tend to polarize into “accomdate the Indian culture” or “state your independence from Indian culture,” on the site and, given that we seem to agree that people do have the right to stand their ground, I was thinking that it would be great if those who are open to experience and other cultures enough to develop relationships with whatever % of whatever specific Indian or immigrant community we’re discussing could encourage them to rise above some of the anxiety and closedminded reactions to tolerate people who choose to be different from them, whether it be their own kids, their son or daughter in-law, their grandkids or whoever. I wanted to make this counterpoint because I thought the post above about their anxiety got us closer to empathy toward their condition, but it seemed to wish to deny the “parochial and closedminded” label. In the context we’re discussing, I think it’s difficult to deny that those labels can often fit and that those characteristics are hurting people not from their culture, despite that they no longer live in a country permeated by their doctrine and culture. So if anyone can help with that, it’s people like you. Hopefully this mitigates some of the defensiveness and helps my point to be understood?
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 16, 2007
at 2:11 am
eh, I was following you until you mentioned “neocon” – because I’m not sure what that term means.
I’ve always thought that political ideologies do NOT fall on a straight line (meaning the far right is fascist and the far left is communist, and never the twain shall meet). In fact I think the political spectrum is a horseshoe shape – the far right and the far left are almost identical in their need to control people, etc, etc, and have more in common then the views of people in the center (which the democrats and republicans in America would probably both be considered “center”, with both parties having fringes that are hardcore.)
When I mentioned the hardcore left in this country and their views on culture, I was talking about the people on the internet who title themselves “progressives”, and then spend a lot of time apologizing for radical Islam and at the same time screaming that Christians in this country are deranged and extremely dangerous to society. I just thought that this was obvious since you can find this stance on pretty much every left-leaning political blog.
Obviously from reading these nutty soliloquies on the internet, I may have a skewed idea of what constitutes a “progressive” or a “neocon” – seems like these labels are thrown around and mean different things to different people, since the women who visit here have labeled themselves “progressives” – and yet don’t seem to hold the views I mentioned.
I’m getting confused on this thread and that’s why I tend to stay away from politics. (Unless it’s long monologues on the evils of communism, of which I’ve become very familiar with, given that my husband is a raving anti-communist and won’t even go back to his home country anymore in protest.
)
By: chineseambassador on December 16, 2007
at 3:52 am
Well, on a non-politics note, the steam bun sonnet was great!! And I can’t imagine a political topic more important than views on Communism anyway…all else is small beans.
By: BerkeleyGradStudent on December 16, 2007
at 7:04 am
Just a quick follow up. Before, I said I personally believe enforcing “liberty as my inalienable right” upon entering someone’s private space as a bunch of ineffective bunk. Perhaps I should have articulated “my liberty.” I think it was important to mention there might be people out there, like me, who don’t feel stripped of their personhood or define their liberty based upon accommodating “the other side.”
As CBC stated it’s all about personal comfort level and I was simply trying to present mine as another possibility. Also, I wanted to highlight some things that have impacted my views and comfort level (The Namesake, etc). I think the Namesake analysis’ were very beneficial.
I should add that by no means am I an expert or 100% sure what my comfort level IS yet. Alas, one reason why I’m attracted to this blog. Beyond that, I have said several times no one has to change who they are, etc., etc., etc., but was simply giving an example of what my comfort level is shaping up to be.
Again, this dialogue has illuminated the fact that there are people do genuinely feel they are at risk of loosing “who they are” or their liberty in interfacing with a non-Western family.
By: Inbetween on December 18, 2007
at 2:37 pm
Also, I will say I’m actually a bit envious of some people on here who are very self-assured and grounded in their beliefs. Last night I told Rajiv I sometimes wish I had more things for him to ‘bend towards me’ on. He’s like “Well I’m glad you like Christmas! I like celebrating that with you!” He said if there were more things I’d like done my way he could be more than willing to engage in compromise. To be honest, I can’t think of that much I’m really set on. I’m kind of lukewarm about most traditionally American things anyway (holidays, sports, imperative family gatherings, tailgate parties
). But I’ve always been like this—never really quite fit in anywhere—have kind of always really enjoyed sampling a wide variety of things. Just wanted to say I do think it’s cool when people have clear beliefs, goals, and desires.
By: Inbetween on December 18, 2007
at 3:44 pm
You will probably discover after you’re married (and especially after children) that you have more things you are set on than you thought. I know at least for me, when I was dating, everything was more romantic and you’re trying to get the know the person and just finding out about them is fascinating – just the fact that they’re different is fascinating and holds allure for you.
It’s a whole different ball of wax once you’re married and the “alluring differentness” starts to actually impact your life. For example, you may have once found it fascinating and a bit funny that his family didn’t celebrate Thanksgiving, or that when they did, they at Indian food instead of Turkey. Then when you’re married and they start planning surprise birthday parties with Indian food on Thanksgiving, you discover it’s not so neat, and furthermore – you actually have a tradition that YOU want to do on Thanksgiving, that didn’t really figure in to your life when you were dating.
Never underestimate the power of “newness” in relationships. It will make you open to WAY more than you otherwise would be.
I didn’t mean any of that in a negative way – just that you likely have more things that are “set” or important to you than you realize, and as your life changes, they will become more apparent to you.
By: colorblindcupid on December 18, 2007
at 3:50 pm
Yes, I think you are exactly right–this is what I am apprehensive about! It’s kind of like when you’re single, used to living very independently for many years, you have no clue what it’s going to be like once trust into this super tight system. No matter how good a fit you are as a couple, it could really be a deal breaker right?! Despite all my liberal musings, to be honest, sometimes I’m not sure if I personally want to take the risk. There’s a MASSIVE difference between being generally excited, curious about, and even amorous towards different cultures and living inside of one (as you can attest)…
By: Inbetween on December 18, 2007
at 3:58 pm
yeah and kids change everything.
When you’re childless and free, you’re open to anything. It’s after you give birth to something that you would gladly die for, that you hover over, protect, and love more than anything in the world – that you find there are more things you want “done your way”. At least that’s what we discovered.
By: chineseambassador on December 18, 2007
at 4:00 pm
You know, I once heard someone say “It’s best to marry into a family that is similar to your own.” I don’t know why that stuck with me, but as the initial crazy individual love fades, is it perhaps wise to err on the side of caution? I think this is another argument for the arranged marriage supporters. Damn. I don’t know! Such a gamble it seems… Maybe it’s always a gamble? It’s just perhaps more clear and upfront to us teetering on the obvious cultural divide?
By: Inbetween on December 18, 2007
at 4:09 pm
oh – well marriage is always a risk. It’s incredible hard work, even if it’s with someone from your culture.
Like we’ve talked about before – you may not like your in-laws even if you marry someone just like you!
Again – it’s all about you and your SO. As much as the family stuff can annoy – as long as your boyfriend stands up for you and the two of you can come to an agreement – you’ll be fine!
Don’t get too depressed yet. lol there’s hope.
By: chineseambassador on December 18, 2007
at 4:35 pm
Ha! Thanks a lot gals. My Indian friends have been really awesome counsel on this too. They all agree that my requests are reasonable and that I shouldn’t have to cave on everything. My good friend, Sanjay (my first Indian crush actually!), put it to me this way: “Well what do you think? Is he gonna be a soldier for you?” (it’s from some cheesy song about being a solider for love). I guess that’s the question I’m going to have to answer with a resounding “Yes!” before I make any major commitments…time, time, time…
By: Inbetween on December 18, 2007
at 4:42 pm
p.s. sometimes it’s extra nice to have my Indian friends’ support when they tell me I’m not being a selfish, culture crushing A-hole.
By: Inbetween on December 18, 2007
at 4:44 pm